The Benefits, Challenges, and Risks of AI in Auditing

Table of Contents

• Overview
• What Are the Key Benefits of Using AI in Auditing?
• How Does AI Improve Audit Quality and Risk Detection?
• What Challenges Do Auditors Face When Adopting AI?
• How Can Auditors Manage AI-related Risks and Limitations?
• Final Thoughts

Overview

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping the audit profession. Sophisticated AI technologies like machine learning (ML), natural language processing (NLP), and large language models (LLMs) allow auditors to quickly analyze data, review documents, test controls, and write reports. While there’s no doubt that this automation can help auditors meet stakeholder demands for higher quality, greater assurance, and strategic insights, the risks and limitations of using AI in auditing remain high.

This article explores the benefits, challenges, and risks of using AI in auditing. We’ll examine how AI can improve audit performance and what auditors must consider to adopt this technology responsibly and ethically.

What Are the Key Benefits of Using AI in Auditing?

AI offers several benefits that allow audit teams to deliver higher-quality results in less time.

1. Efficiency Gains Through Automation

The biggest benefit of AI is its ability to automate repetitive, time-consuming tasks. This can increase audit efficiency by reducing the manual effort involved in:

• Data extraction and analysis: AI can automatically pull required financial figures or clauses from contracts, invoices, and policy documents.
• Transaction classification: AI can categorize thousands of entries based on pre-defined or learned criteria.
• Writing: AI can create initial drafts of workpapers, reports, and other deliverables.

This automation can free up hundreds of hours per engagement, allowing staff to shift their focus to activities that require deep expertise and professional judgment. For instance, AuditPal AI has a tool to summarize lengthy PDF documents in seconds, allowing auditors to focus on evaluating the control design rather than just reading the text.

2. Improved Accuracy and Consistency

AI models can easily apply rules and logic across massive datasets, reducing the likelihood of human error and minimizing unintended bias. For example, AI can quickly:

• Flag duplicate or contradictory entries across systems.
• Validate calculations and totals across multiple documents.
• Ensure consistent document formatting and reference linking.

These capabilities lead to more reliable audit documentation, fewer review notes, and a higher overall level of assurance.

3. Enhanced Risk Detection

AI models, particularly those using ML, can analyze entire populations of transactions to identify subtle anomalies, hidden trends, and control failures. By learning from historical data and established risk indicators, AI tools are capable of surfacing risks that traditional, manual methods are prone to missing.

As Deloitte notes, AI can enable a higher level of quality, assurance, and productivity by detecting risks earlier and with greater precision.

4. Better Use of Auditor Judgment

By offloading low-level, high-volume tasks, AI allows auditors to spend more time on strategic, high-value activities such as:

• Evaluating complex accounting estimates and financial models.
• Interpreting nuanced findings and their business impact.
• Providing advice to clients on process improvements and risk mitigations.

5. Scalability Across Engagements

Once trained, AI tools can be deployed across multiple clients, industries, and geographies. They can be adapted to handle different:

• Document types (e.g., PDF, Word, Excel, and PowerPoint files)
• Control frameworks such as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) and the Internal Control - Integrated Framework from the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
• Reporting formats such as the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP).

This scalability can make AI an ideal technology for firms seeking to standardize and improve quality control across a diverse portfolio of engagements.

How Does AI Improve Audit Quality and Risk Detection?

AI can improve audit quality and risk detection by enabling full-population testing, uncovering hidden patterns, and enhancing the precision of risk assessments. These capabilities shift the auditor’s focus from mere compliance to deep, comprehensive assurance, thus helping identify issues earlier and with greater confidence.

1. Full-Population Testing vs. Sampling

Traditional audits usually rely on sampling due to the time and resource constraints associated with reviewing vast amounts of data. AI eliminates this limitation by allowing auditors to analyze the entire population of transactions. This shift can provide key benefits, such as:

• Reducing sampling risk: By reviewing every transaction, the chance of missing a material misstatement hidden in an unselected sample is eliminated.
• Increasing coverage: The scope of testing is expanded, improving the reliability of the audit conclusions.

For example, instead of testing a sample of 30 journal entries, AI can scan all 30,000 entries and flag only those that deviate significantly from historical patterns or control expectations.

Christina Ho, a member of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) has emphasized the importance of technology in expanding audit coverage and improving evidence quality as a means to better protect investors.

2. Anomaly Detection and Pattern Recognition

ML algorithms excel at identifying unusual transactions, timing irregularities, or control failures that may not be obvious. These can include:

• Duplicate payments: AI can uncover instances where the same invoice was paid multiple times.
• Round-dollar transactions: AI can flag high-value transactions entered without cents, which can sometimes indicate manual override or manipulation.
• Weekend entries: AI can identify unusual activity occurring outside standard business hours.
• Vendor concentration risks: AI can highlight an excessive reliance on a single supplier, which can pose a business risk.

3. Improved Fraud Detection

AI can make it easier to detect red flags that suggest potential fraud. By analyzing behavioral and transactional data, AI can identify sophisticated schemes that rely on subtle manipulations, such as:

• Transactions that repeatedly fall just below the approval threshold of a manager.
• Frequent, unsupported changes to vendor master data, potentially for setting up ghost vendors.
• Inconsistent application of expense policies across different departments or individuals.

4. Real-Time Risk Assessment

AI can enable auditors to assess risks as new data becomes available. This capability supports a shift toward continuous auditing, which allows for:

• Adaptive audit procedures: Procedures can be adjusted mid-engagement based on newly identified, emerging risks.
• Timely escalation of issues: Critical control failures or high-risk transactions can be flagged for immediate management attention, rather than waiting until the end of the audit cycle.
• Continuous monitoring: For internal audit, AI tools can monitor key controls, providing a real-time view of the control environment.

AuditPal AI supports this model by allowing auditors to identify key risk areas instantly.

5. Consistency Across Engagements

When standardized AI models are used across the firm, they apply the same logic and thresholds across multiple clients and industries. This reduces variability in risk assessments that might otherwise stem from auditor judgment, thereby improving comparability and supporting firm-wide quality control initiatives.

What Challenges Do Auditors Face When Adopting AI?

While AI presents significant opportunities, auditors face several key challenges when adopting it. These obstacles can impact the reliability of AI outputs, the compliance with existing standards, and the ability to integrate new tools into audit engagements. Addressing these issues is critical for successful AI adoption.

1. Data Quality and Availability

AI models, particularly those based on ML, rely on high-quality, structured data. In many audit environments, client data poses significant hurdles:

• Incomplete or inconsistent data: Missing fields or inconsistent data formatting can confuse AI algorithms, leading to unreliable or biased outputs.
• Legacy systems: Data stored in outdated or siloed systems may be difficult to access or integrate with modern AI tools.
• Unstructured data: A large portion of audit evidence (e.g., scanned PDFs, emails, contracts) is unstructured, requiring complex tools to make it usable.

Poor data quality can lead to inaccurate outputs, missed risks, or false positives, eroding trust in the AI tool. Auditors must perform robust data readiness assessments before relying on any AI tool.

2. Explainability and Transparency (The ‘Black Box’ Problem)

Many advanced AI models like deep learning networks and LLMs can behave like black boxes. This means it is often difficult or impossible for a human auditor to trace how the system arrived at a specific conclusion (e.g., why a transaction was flagged as high risk). This lack of transparency can pose significant challenges for auditors:

• Justifying audit findings: Auditors must be able to explain and support their findings to clients, management, and regulators. If AI-generated output can’t be explained, findings may be deemed unsubstantiated.
• Maintaining professional skepticism: Auditors must not simply accept AI output. Lack of explainability can make it difficult to apply critical thinking and professional skepticism to the results.
• Responding to regulator inquiries: Regulators often require clear documentation of the audit process. If the underlying AI logic isn’t properly documented, it can create a compliance risk.

To address these challenges, auditors can use explainable AI (XAI) tools that provide confidence scores, audit trails, and clear links between the output and the input data.

3. Regulatory and Ethical Concerns

Regulators are still studying the implications of AI on auditing, so auditors need to proceed cautiously and sufficiently document their AI outputs. AI adoption raises critical questions about:

• Compliance with audit standards: How do existing standards like the Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (GAAS) apply to AI-generated evidence?
• Data privacy and confidentiality: Using AI, particularly cloud-based tools, requires careful management of sensitive client data to ensure compliance with privacy laws and regulations, including the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). AuditPal AI is one of the best tools for ensuring privacy and compliance.
• Bias and fairness: If the training data used for an AI model contains historical bias, the model may perpetuate that bias in its risk assessments, leading to unfair or misleading conclusions.

4. Skill Gaps and Change Management

Many auditors lack formal training in AI. This skill gap can lead to several negative outcomes:

• Misuse of tools: Auditors may apply AI tools to inappropriate tasks or misinterpret the limitations of the output.
• Overreliance on outputs: A lack of technical understanding can lead to an unquestioning acceptance of AI results, undermining professional skepticism.
• Resistance to adoption: Organizational inertia and resistance to change among established audit teams can slow down the integration of new technologies.

5. Tool Reliability and Vendor Risk

The market is saturated with various AI tools, but not all are created equal. Auditors must perform due diligence to evaluate the reliability of the chosen solution and manage vendor risk:

• Accuracy and robustness: The tool must produce accurate outputs across diverse data sets and client environments.
• Security practices: The vendor must demonstrate robust controls over data handling, storage, and security.
• Audit-specific design: Generic AI platforms may lack the necessary controls, context, or documentation features required for regulatory compliance in an audit setting.

Choosing tools like AuditPal AI, which are designed for auditors and offer clear, defensible documentation, helps reduce implementation and reliance risk.

How Can Auditors Manage AI-related Risks and Limitations?

Auditors can manage AI-related risks and limitations by implementing strong governance, validating outputs, maintaining professional skepticism, and choosing tools designed for audit use. These practices can help AI enhance audit quality and efficiency without compromising integrity, compliance, or professional standards.

1. Establish AI Governance Frameworks

Firms must define clear, documented policies and procedures for the responsible use of AI. A robust AI governance framework should specify:

• Use cases: Clear guidelines on when and how AI can be used.
• Oversight: Defining roles and responsibilities for reviewing, approving, and monitoring the use of AI tools and models.
• Ethics and fairness: Policies to assess AI models for potential bias and ensure fair application across all clients.

The Global Internal Audit Standards from the Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) also recommends embedding responsible AI principles into the audit methodology.

2. Validate AI Outputs with Traditional Evidence

Auditors should always treat AI-generated output as preliminary insights. They aren’t final, conclusive audit evidence. To maintain audit rigor, required validation steps include:

• Cross-checking: Auditors should verify AI-flagged transactions against original source documents, such as invoices, contracts, and general ledgers.
• Re-performing: Auditors should manually re-perform key calculations or logic derived by the AI on a sample basis.
• Confirming assumptions: Auditors should review the logic and underlying data assumptions the AI model used to reach its conclusions.

This hybrid approach (using AI for scale but human judgment for verification) ensures findings are defensible under scrutiny from regulators, peer reviewers, and clients.

3. Maintain Professional Skepticism

The adoption of powerful AI tools must not lead to an erosion of professional skepticism. Auditors must interpret AI results critically, asking probing questions such as:

• Is the flagged anomaly unusual, or is it explainable by the client’s unique business context or temporary process change?
• Does the AI output align logically with other evidence gathered in the engagement?
• Could the model have been tricked or misled by unusual input data?

The auditor’s responsibility to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence remains paramount, regardless of the technology used.

4. Use Audit-Specific AI Tools

Public-facing AI platforms may lack the security, controls, and contextual understanding necessary for regulated audit work. Auditors should prioritize tools like AuditPal AI that are:

• Purpose-built: Designed to align with audit procedures, professional standards, and documentation requirements.
• Secure: Offering robust data isolation, encryption, and adherence to strict data privacy protocols.
• Transparent: Providing clear audit trails and explainability features that link outputs back to the source data.

Choosing purpose-built tools can reduce the risk of misapplication and enhance the reliability and defensibility of the audit evidence.

5. Document AI Use and Rationale

Detailed documentation is essential for transparency and regulatory compliance. Auditors should document the:

• Tools used: Which specific AI tool and version were used?
• Task and purpose: What specific audit task was automated?
• Validation process: How were the AI outputs tested and validated?
• Justification: Why was the use of AI deemed appropriate for the audit objective?

This meticulous record-keeping supports quality control and helps auditors respond to any inquiries regarding the use of AI.

Final Thoughts

AI offers significant benefits for auditors, from achieving efficiency gains through automation to enabling smarter, full-population risk detection. Yet, it also introduces challenges related to data quality, model explainability, and regulatory alignment that require thoughtful, strategic management.

By embracing strong governance, committing to continuous upskilling, and applying rigorous professional skepticism to all AI-generated outputs, auditors can adopt this technology responsibly. The future of auditing is one where AI tools act as powerful co-pilots, allowing auditors to focus on their most valuable roles: judgment, interpretation, and strategic advisory.

If these efficiency and quality gains resonate with you, it’s time to take the next step and integrate smart tools into your workflow.

Try AuditPal AI for Free